Comments on: The Truth About the “Military Kidnapping” Video From the G-20

By: frarnie

frarnie — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:38:18 +0000

whatever happened to backpack guy and why hasn’t he come forward??

By: mitailbu

mitailbu — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:52:23 +0000

those “real cops” came from Hardin Montana

By: ProfeSSor ViLE

ProfeSSor ViLE — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:58:32 +0000

First, it is obvious to anybody with half a brain cell that those guys weren’t military. I might have thought it was a publicity stunt by the protesters, but the guys in camo looked too clean and in shape to be some Anarchy Inc quasi-commie professional shit disturbers. The official explanation makes sense.

Second, why is everybody bitching about this guy’s rights being violated? Since when are the police not allowed to arrest somebody unless their guilt is proven? There’s a reason we have trials, folks.

If you don’t want to get arrested, don’t valdalize businesses and public spaces. Better yet, just stay away from these spoiled hippie-crites altogether.

By: Find What You Need At An Information Center | Unforgettable Name

Find What You Need At An Information Center | Unforgettable Name — Sat, 03 Oct 2009 02:44:25 +0000

[...] The College Politico » Blog Archive » The Truth About the … [...]

By: kabsters

kabsters — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 09:01:26 +0000

LOL @ Danton. Firstly, How many coverups have you seen as a fire lieutenant? You’ve told us to doubt everything we see cause the “truth is out there.” Well I am doubting you. So give me some facts about these “cover-ups.” Secondly, Your reasoning is neither sound nor logical. You present that video as the only fact in the case. But you lack a great deal of context for the video. For instance, there is no way for you to know whether or not the protestor was a vandal much less presuppose that he was a secret government agent or w/e. So from your POV, your conclusion is just as ridiculous as the college politico’s, isn’t it? You are guilty of the same crime you are accusing TCP of. Except, here is the kicker, TCP actually did a little research and came to a more valid conclusion than yours. A truly good critical thinker looks for context and then draws conclusions. Your context consists of this: I’ve seen coverups/conspiracies, therefore this must be a coverup/conspiracy.

As for ppl like Erica Little, you should perhaps look at giving back all that money you paid for your law degree. I took one criminal justice course in college and this was one of the first things we learned: The Miranda warnings must be read prior to questioning of the suspect, not prior to or during the arrest of a suspect. If you don’t believe me, then look it up. Anywhere you look will tell you that. But I doubt you’re a student of the law anyway, so you probably will not take the time to look it up. And if you are a lawyer, thanks for leaving your name. Now I know who not to go to if I need legal counsel.

By: GunPundit » Blog Archive » Snatch and Grab by G-20 Tactical Response Team

Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:54:31 +0000

[...] was for real, but I hadn’t been able to find anything derfinitive online until a reader sent Murdoc a heads up: Statement from G-20 Joint Information Center to College Politico: The individuals involved in the [...]

By: Murdoc Online » BDU Guys in Protest Video Weren’t A Hoax

Murdoc Online » BDU Guys in Protest Video Weren’t A Hoax — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:46:29 +0000

By: Danton

Danton — Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:50:31 +0000

Reply to:”But you have no actual facts. All you have is inane speculation from the black pit that is Alex Jones…”

I’ll sum it all up for you buddy boy:
You have no facts.

“The G-20 Joint Information Center, which can be reached at 412-402-7630, issued this statement to me which explains exactly what is going on in that video:”

Did you believe Geithner when he told everyone he’d made a mistake concerning his tax return also?
Did you believe Paulson when he threatened martial law if Congress didn’t acquiesce to his demands for the TARP bailout?
THINK!

“Given the actual facts we know why is it unreasonable to believe the official story?”

What facts?
Another official version?

A “shrink” might diagnose you as co-dependent due to your considerable minimalize,justify,rationalize point of view.
Now go back and read what I last sent you…and get the Alex Jones association out of your thought process.

It’s really set you up psychologically to deny the many possibilities.

“But you have no actual facts. All you have is inane speculation from the black pit that is Alex Jones…”

Wow! How do you feel about Gerald Celente,Glenn Beck, John Batchelor or Sarah Palin?
After all, this is a forum for opinions, viewpoints and discussions.
They have opinions also, mostly arrived at through what they’ve heard,seen,experienced….. or felt in their gut.

As far as facts…you’ve posted a video (a fact)
As far as facts…you have an official explanation.(NOT a fact)
As far as facts…All you have is inane speculation that a Security Force’s spokesperson is telling you the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

And what exactly do zip-tie handcuffs prove?
Anyone can purchase those through the many catalogs online.

Go with your “gut” feeling.

Since when are people not allowed to peacefully assemble?
Since when has it become “ordinary” for our rights to be so routinely violated?
Since when have there been such a blur between the military,the local police force, and private security?
Those are FACTS!